Nov 11, 2023·edited Nov 11, 2023Liked by Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD
So in the placebo arm, 159 pregnant women were studied, and 159 infants were born and lived to be studied.
In the 'vaccine' arm, 161 pregnant women were studied, but only 156 infants were born and/or lived to be studied.
Quite a shortfall in the treatment arm.
Another reason for not reaching the promised 4000 might be the difficulty of recruiting. Finding that many parents-to-be who are willing to have their babies experimented on, is a big ask. No honey, sushi or wine...but sure, inject me/my progeny with novel genetic 'software' because you're not sure whether it's safe and you want to find out.
Rightly, a very tough sell.
But yes, with these early outcomes they would have had to stop the trial.
Here is a somewhat related British Medical Journal article by Peter Doshi, "The FDA and Moderna’s cosy relationship: how lax rules enable a revolving door culture": https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2486
Nov 6, 2023·edited Nov 6, 2023Liked by Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD
It seems like women's health and particularly fertility has been a primary place for doing "bad faith" science on COVID. Perhaps it's because women who are pregnant are naturally more vigilant and so it's easier to change the culture by targeting pregnant women with advertising misinformation using badly reported science in order to keep people in lockstep with vaccine uptake.
I remember an article that came out on COVID that was pushed by UCSF specifically trying to show that "COVID puts people at risk for complications in delivery by 35%". What they failed to mention of course is that it does so if you are already overweight, have hypertension, poor income, etc. etc. There was no significant effect for healthy women. Of course, the headline was about the danger of COVID across the board and they pumped that 35% (trick to show your friends: whenever you see a percentage with no other metric, hold that frickin wallet -- anything that can fit on a headline about science is probably a deception) throughout the article. And that's how far most people will read, so now this is the culture we get.
Injured parties must and will rise up. It’s taking longer than anyone would like but this cannot stand. The disregard for human life is unconscionable. Two vaccinated friends lost their pregnancies.
I see they designed the trial to not enroll in the first trimester of pregnancy, the same group that had the highest miscarriage rate in prior publications. This is not an accident.
Significantly higher Birth Defects are reported in Children of Jabbed Mothers, which will no doubt be covered in the Teratology study ongoing. These included Atrial septal defect, Congenital naevus, DiGeorge's syndrome, Hydrocele, Hypotonia, Microcephaly, Mucopolysaccharidosis, Polydactyly, Syndactyly, Trisomy 21, Jaundice, Low birth weight baby, Small for dates baby, Meconium aspiration syndrome, Apgar score low.
So in the placebo arm, 159 pregnant women were studied, and 159 infants were born and lived to be studied.
In the 'vaccine' arm, 161 pregnant women were studied, but only 156 infants were born and/or lived to be studied.
Quite a shortfall in the treatment arm.
Another reason for not reaching the promised 4000 might be the difficulty of recruiting. Finding that many parents-to-be who are willing to have their babies experimented on, is a big ask. No honey, sushi or wine...but sure, inject me/my progeny with novel genetic 'software' because you're not sure whether it's safe and you want to find out.
Rightly, a very tough sell.
But yes, with these early outcomes they would have had to stop the trial.
Here is a somewhat related British Medical Journal article by Peter Doshi, "The FDA and Moderna’s cosy relationship: how lax rules enable a revolving door culture": https://www.bmj.com/content/383/bmj.p2486
It seems like women's health and particularly fertility has been a primary place for doing "bad faith" science on COVID. Perhaps it's because women who are pregnant are naturally more vigilant and so it's easier to change the culture by targeting pregnant women with advertising misinformation using badly reported science in order to keep people in lockstep with vaccine uptake.
I remember an article that came out on COVID that was pushed by UCSF specifically trying to show that "COVID puts people at risk for complications in delivery by 35%". What they failed to mention of course is that it does so if you are already overweight, have hypertension, poor income, etc. etc. There was no significant effect for healthy women. Of course, the headline was about the danger of COVID across the board and they pumped that 35% (trick to show your friends: whenever you see a percentage with no other metric, hold that frickin wallet -- anything that can fit on a headline about science is probably a deception) throughout the article. And that's how far most people will read, so now this is the culture we get.
Typo (“there” instead of “their” in first sentence beginning “I posted on X.”
Injured parties must and will rise up. It’s taking longer than anyone would like but this cannot stand. The disregard for human life is unconscionable. Two vaccinated friends lost their pregnancies.
I see they designed the trial to not enroll in the first trimester of pregnancy, the same group that had the highest miscarriage rate in prior publications. This is not an accident.
Significantly higher Birth Defects are reported in Children of Jabbed Mothers, which will no doubt be covered in the Teratology study ongoing. These included Atrial septal defect, Congenital naevus, DiGeorge's syndrome, Hydrocele, Hypotonia, Microcephaly, Mucopolysaccharidosis, Polydactyly, Syndactyly, Trisomy 21, Jaundice, Low birth weight baby, Small for dates baby, Meconium aspiration syndrome, Apgar score low.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-biontech-covid19-jab-multiple
thank you for sharing. )
I've been really afraid for my double jabbed pregnant friends ... what does one do? (
There were a lot of terrible things that happened in the last 3 years, but harm to unborn babies might be the worst. T