Did you not just get shafted by UC Davis? Here you report on the guy who wrote the Pfizer report and took money from them, one Timothy Albertson, MD, PhD Chair of Internal Medicine at UC Davis. Are you burying the lede here? What was his role in burning you at the stake? From my reading and observation of you, Tracy Beth, you are very fair, balanced, reserved, and circumspect, and not a bad runner it seems. All great characteristics! You are smart and well trained and disciplined. But let's name names. The academy is corrupt thru and thru. The academic vested interest juggernaut that just burned you at the stake is the same set of running dog shills who moonlight on the side as corrupt corporate compatriots. Is Albertson complicit in more than just lining his pockets by producing this "research"? Did he also participate in your witch trial in Davis?
Mar 22·edited Mar 22Liked by Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD
Thanks for pointing out that very high troponin levels existed only in the vaccine group.
Perhaps this has something to do with the authors' Clopper Pearson method of calculating confidence intervals: If at least one participant was in the 200 plus nanogram group, the true probability cannot be zero. It would be unsurprising if the chosen method of calculating confidence intervals was excessively wide, to make zero effect look plausible.
As usual, we can vaccinate millions of people but not scrape together a big enough study to show real benefit versus harm.
To add insult to literal injury, the biggest studies are sponsored by the very companies making tens of billions of dollars from the drugs.
The typo in Fig 1 should read 734 rather than 7534, no?
Seems like the whole paper is rather low quality, plus a low quality study design. And a hired gun investigator. What could possibly go wrong?
Tracy, there is a charity in the UK called Cardiac Risk in the Young (CRY). Since pre Covid times they have been screening teenagers for heart issues (ECG I think mainly). They have stepped up efforts post Covid and my sons school was screened earlier this month. Sadly too late for one 17 year old who died on the sports field this weekend.
My son (unvaccinated) was screened and I filled in the questionnaire beforehand. Lots of Qs about covid vaccination (how many, when, what type). I wrote to them and asked if they will be using data collected on this to do any research and hoped that politics would not limit publication. It might be worth reaching out to them and offering your services. I don’t know how much you can tell from an ECG, but it might be a good source of data. Just a thought.
There are so many beats to discern. Too many! I am a 71 year old male who, along with my wife, have never had a flu shot, never wavered in our scepticism and refusal of the Covid shot, resisted within reason mask mandates and lockdowns and have been completely shocked at the dissolution of our society and the rise in propaganda, censorship, and virtue signaling. We stand, uncomfortably, somehow as sentinels of critical thinking and fact pattern observation. It is often lonely. But not as lonely as it is for you and Drs Nass, Marik, etc. I now live in a society like those I read about as a young student and adult - Orwell, Koestler, Kafka. Soviet show trials, Maoist struggle serious. One day I weep for what our world has come to, esp our ole USA. The next day I plead w my friends to understand the compelling utility of the Bill of Rights. No issue in all this is as dire as the take downs of educated, licensed, experienced clinicians like yourself and researchers at academic institutions such as Kildorf at Harvard. This is extremely alarming. And it is being done(the water carried) by cohorts. This is the final corruption of the professional class. Mao sits in his cave in Yunan and unleashes wilding youth to flog hard working people. And the professional class aids and abets. They read the NYT and feel smug satisfaction. I applaud your work and courage!
Their clinical trial population was limited to young people who already had gotten two MRNA vaccines? Therefore, any subject who had an adverse event was not likely to enroll. Wow! And I thought I'd seen all of the Pharma clinical trial trickery. This is in the same category of technique used invthe statin clinical trials. Where there was a run-in period of everyone getting statins. And 30-50% dropped out due to side effects. Then its easy to recruit the participants from those who had no side effects.
Hi Tracy, I watched your online discussion with Denis Rancourt on Illusion of Consensus. I have come across one explanation why Sweden and Denmark did not have any extra excess mortality whatsoever correlating with the Covid "vaccine" rollout. The nurses/doctors in Denmark and Sweden who administered the jabs used aspiration to avoid injecting the "vaccine" into a blood vessel. In many other countries they did not check whether they hit any blood vessels when injecting the novel gene therapeutics.
Please look at Mark Girardot's bolus theory.
A Flawed Medical Procedure x Billions of Times = A Medical Armageddon
And you may also want to look at Dr John Campbell's work that non-aspiration may well cause injuries for those unlucky ones whose "vaccine" gets directly into the blood vessel and not the muscle.
Please furthermore note that in Germany the Biontech/Pfizer vaccine was rolled out to residents from old people's homes from 27 December 2020. Most residents would have received two jabs by end of January 2021. Please note that there was a HUGE 29 percent increase in mortality in the above 80 year old population in Germany in January 2021 according to the January report from the German Office of National Statistics.
"The above-average number of deaths in January 2021 was largely due to an increase in deaths in the 80+ age group. In January, 29% or 14,464 more people aged 80 and over died than the average for the previous four years in this month. The number of deaths among the under-80s differed significantly less from the four-year average in January (+4% or +1,461 deaths)."
It us clear that there must be very high number of recently vaccinated among those 14,464 deaths.
Note that in Germany they jabbed the people without aspiration.
It was only at the beginning of 2022 that the German Center of disease controll, the Robert Koch Institut, started to recommend aspiration citing a study where rodents developped myocarditis when the mRNA vaccine was injected without aspiration into the blood vessels of the animals.
How can real data be collected and published when pharma owns so many people?
Did you not just get shafted by UC Davis? Here you report on the guy who wrote the Pfizer report and took money from them, one Timothy Albertson, MD, PhD Chair of Internal Medicine at UC Davis. Are you burying the lede here? What was his role in burning you at the stake? From my reading and observation of you, Tracy Beth, you are very fair, balanced, reserved, and circumspect, and not a bad runner it seems. All great characteristics! You are smart and well trained and disciplined. But let's name names. The academy is corrupt thru and thru. The academic vested interest juggernaut that just burned you at the stake is the same set of running dog shills who moonlight on the side as corrupt corporate compatriots. Is Albertson complicit in more than just lining his pockets by producing this "research"? Did he also participate in your witch trial in Davis?
Thanks for pointing out that very high troponin levels existed only in the vaccine group.
Perhaps this has something to do with the authors' Clopper Pearson method of calculating confidence intervals: If at least one participant was in the 200 plus nanogram group, the true probability cannot be zero. It would be unsurprising if the chosen method of calculating confidence intervals was excessively wide, to make zero effect look plausible.
As usual, we can vaccinate millions of people but not scrape together a big enough study to show real benefit versus harm.
To add insult to literal injury, the biggest studies are sponsored by the very companies making tens of billions of dollars from the drugs.
The typo in Fig 1 should read 734 rather than 7534, no?
Seems like the whole paper is rather low quality, plus a low quality study design. And a hired gun investigator. What could possibly go wrong?
Tracy, there is a charity in the UK called Cardiac Risk in the Young (CRY). Since pre Covid times they have been screening teenagers for heart issues (ECG I think mainly). They have stepped up efforts post Covid and my sons school was screened earlier this month. Sadly too late for one 17 year old who died on the sports field this weekend.
My son (unvaccinated) was screened and I filled in the questionnaire beforehand. Lots of Qs about covid vaccination (how many, when, what type). I wrote to them and asked if they will be using data collected on this to do any research and hoped that politics would not limit publication. It might be worth reaching out to them and offering your services. I don’t know how much you can tell from an ECG, but it might be a good source of data. Just a thought.
Great work Tracy!
Nice. Could you submit it to the journal as a letter to the authors for response?
There are so many beats to discern. Too many! I am a 71 year old male who, along with my wife, have never had a flu shot, never wavered in our scepticism and refusal of the Covid shot, resisted within reason mask mandates and lockdowns and have been completely shocked at the dissolution of our society and the rise in propaganda, censorship, and virtue signaling. We stand, uncomfortably, somehow as sentinels of critical thinking and fact pattern observation. It is often lonely. But not as lonely as it is for you and Drs Nass, Marik, etc. I now live in a society like those I read about as a young student and adult - Orwell, Koestler, Kafka. Soviet show trials, Maoist struggle serious. One day I weep for what our world has come to, esp our ole USA. The next day I plead w my friends to understand the compelling utility of the Bill of Rights. No issue in all this is as dire as the take downs of educated, licensed, experienced clinicians like yourself and researchers at academic institutions such as Kildorf at Harvard. This is extremely alarming. And it is being done(the water carried) by cohorts. This is the final corruption of the professional class. Mao sits in his cave in Yunan and unleashes wilding youth to flog hard working people. And the professional class aids and abets. They read the NYT and feel smug satisfaction. I applaud your work and courage!
Their clinical trial population was limited to young people who already had gotten two MRNA vaccines? Therefore, any subject who had an adverse event was not likely to enroll. Wow! And I thought I'd seen all of the Pharma clinical trial trickery. This is in the same category of technique used invthe statin clinical trials. Where there was a run-in period of everyone getting statins. And 30-50% dropped out due to side effects. Then its easy to recruit the participants from those who had no side effects.
Enjoy the running and hiking Tracy. You deserve it . Thank you. 🌷
Thanks Tracy Beth
Have added your excellent critical review here:
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-process-2-endotoxin-myocarditis
Hi Tracy, I watched your online discussion with Denis Rancourt on Illusion of Consensus. I have come across one explanation why Sweden and Denmark did not have any extra excess mortality whatsoever correlating with the Covid "vaccine" rollout. The nurses/doctors in Denmark and Sweden who administered the jabs used aspiration to avoid injecting the "vaccine" into a blood vessel. In many other countries they did not check whether they hit any blood vessels when injecting the novel gene therapeutics.
Please look at Mark Girardot's bolus theory.
A Flawed Medical Procedure x Billions of Times = A Medical Armageddon
https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/a-flawed-medical-procedure-x-billions
And you may also want to look at Dr John Campbell's work that non-aspiration may well cause injuries for those unlucky ones whose "vaccine" gets directly into the blood vessel and not the muscle.
https://youtu.be/D6hUoosMOuU?si=m_CP0oiadswL5ift
Please furthermore note that in Germany the Biontech/Pfizer vaccine was rolled out to residents from old people's homes from 27 December 2020. Most residents would have received two jabs by end of January 2021. Please note that there was a HUGE 29 percent increase in mortality in the above 80 year old population in Germany in January 2021 according to the January report from the German Office of National Statistics.
"The above-average number of deaths in January 2021 was largely due to an increase in deaths in the 80+ age group. In January, 29% or 14,464 more people aged 80 and over died than the average for the previous four years in this month. The number of deaths among the under-80s differed significantly less from the four-year average in January (+4% or +1,461 deaths)."
https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2021/02/PD21_056_12621.html
It us clear that there must be very high number of recently vaccinated among those 14,464 deaths.
Note that in Germany they jabbed the people without aspiration.
It was only at the beginning of 2022 that the German Center of disease controll, the Robert Koch Institut, started to recommend aspiration citing a study where rodents developped myocarditis when the mRNA vaccine was injected without aspiration into the blood vessels of the animals.