Process 1 or 2, it is completely irrelevant. It’s like “Do you want to be shot or hanged? Choose wisely, you know, shooting is loud, it may harm your hearing.” Whatever name you give to it, the end result is the same. We don’t know what is there in the vial - we know it is different from what was advertised. We don’t know how it operates - we know that it works completely different to what we were told. We don’t know the antidote - we know that have no idea how to stop its effect, detox it or neutralize it.
The very principle of operation of that thing was obvious from the start, and all those commenting or analyzing the vial seem to have forgotten it. The active ingredient, aka spike protein, is the key harming agent - it has always been so and the whole story was sold under this heading. One day, a genius “scientist” woke up and said, “Let’s do it, let’s inject this toxin, we’ll tell them their body will protect itself against it” - one of the key unproven theories of immunology. It was not enough. The genius added, “Let’s repeat this intoxination as often as we can, why not? It will progressively weaken the victim, so what.” It was not enough. The genius painted their dream: “Let’s inject them with whatever we have in stock, we’ll sell it as selective products against particular diseases.” And they are doing it under the false pretenses of “most Responsive Neutralizing Agonizing technology”.
But their greatest success is that they have managed to hypnotize truly brilliant minds into continuous analyzing of this thing. You will talk about, write about it, discuss it, quarrel about it, draw cute charts, compile slide decks, sell bestseller books, organize conferences, broadcast podcasts - all in self-love of “Me, I know what this is about, I will tell you all.” It’s all empty and vain effort. It won’t change anything. As we can see from “their” actions, the medical harm infliction campaign continues and gathers momentum. The killer technology has metastasized, targeting more defense mechanisms of the body, commonly called “diseases”. Obedient lawyers work long nights to make sure we won’t have a say ever.
The original Pfizer paper had lower adverse event rates of 13.9% (placebo) and 30.2% (BNT162b2) in Table S3 of the supplement. Trial sites could have different criteria though. The ratio was similar to Process 2.
Great video Tracey!
Check out the song "Ain't no rock and roll" about how the music rebels/activist heroes sold is out.
https://www.fivetimesaugust.com/
Process 1 or 2, it is completely irrelevant. It’s like “Do you want to be shot or hanged? Choose wisely, you know, shooting is loud, it may harm your hearing.” Whatever name you give to it, the end result is the same. We don’t know what is there in the vial - we know it is different from what was advertised. We don’t know how it operates - we know that it works completely different to what we were told. We don’t know the antidote - we know that have no idea how to stop its effect, detox it or neutralize it.
The very principle of operation of that thing was obvious from the start, and all those commenting or analyzing the vial seem to have forgotten it. The active ingredient, aka spike protein, is the key harming agent - it has always been so and the whole story was sold under this heading. One day, a genius “scientist” woke up and said, “Let’s do it, let’s inject this toxin, we’ll tell them their body will protect itself against it” - one of the key unproven theories of immunology. It was not enough. The genius added, “Let’s repeat this intoxination as often as we can, why not? It will progressively weaken the victim, so what.” It was not enough. The genius painted their dream: “Let’s inject them with whatever we have in stock, we’ll sell it as selective products against particular diseases.” And they are doing it under the false pretenses of “most Responsive Neutralizing Agonizing technology”.
But their greatest success is that they have managed to hypnotize truly brilliant minds into continuous analyzing of this thing. You will talk about, write about it, discuss it, quarrel about it, draw cute charts, compile slide decks, sell bestseller books, organize conferences, broadcast podcasts - all in self-love of “Me, I know what this is about, I will tell you all.” It’s all empty and vain effort. It won’t change anything. As we can see from “their” actions, the medical harm infliction campaign continues and gathers momentum. The killer technology has metastasized, targeting more defense mechanisms of the body, commonly called “diseases”. Obedient lawyers work long nights to make sure we won’t have a say ever.
But we are happily discussing Process 1 or 2.
The original Pfizer paper had lower adverse event rates of 13.9% (placebo) and 30.2% (BNT162b2) in Table S3 of the supplement. Trial sites could have different criteria though. The ratio was similar to Process 2.